After analyses of existing monitoring frameworks, stakeholders from the Urban Agenda Partnership assessed the long list of indicators from the existing models according to the following criteria:

  • „Core/additional indicator (2 = core; 1 = additional, 0 = not relevant) Do you think the indicator is relevant for measuring CE in a city?
  • Data availability and quality at city level (from 2 = high availability,to 0= no/scarse availability): Is information available (or could be available) at the city level?
  • Influence of local authority on the indicator (from 2= high influence, to 0= no/very limited influence): To what extent can a local authority influence the activity measured by a specific indicator?“ 

The results of the mapping is a list of suggested indicators listed in the table below:

WordPress Data Table Plugin
Skip to content