#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table { border-collapse: collapse; }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.stripe tbody tr.even { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.stripe.order-column tbody tr > .sorting_1 { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.hover tbody tr:hover { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.stripe.order-column tbody tr.even > .sorting_1 { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.order-column tbody tr > .sorting_1 { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper table.hover.order-column tbody tr:hover > .sorting_1 { }#supsystic-table-1_wrapper tbody td { background-color: inherit; }/* Here you can add custom CSS for the current table */ /* Lean more about CSS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets */ /* To prevent the use of styles to other tables use "#supsystic-table-1" as a base selector for example: #supsystic-table-1 { ... } #supsystic-table-1 tbody { ... } #supsystic-table-1 tbody tr { ... } */ li { padding: 10px; }
Suggested indicators
Indicators for the circular economy

After analyses of existing monitoring frameworks, stakeholders from the Urban Agenda Partnership assessed the long list of indicators from the existing models according to the following criteria:

  • „Core/additional indicator (2 = core; 1 = additional, 0 = not relevant) Do you think the indicator is relevant for measuring CE in a city?
  • Data availability and quality at city level (from 2 = high availability,to 0= no/scarse availability): Is information available (or could be available) at the city level?
  • Influence of local authority on the indicator (from 2= high influence, to 0= no/very limited influence): To what extent can a local authority influence the activity measured by a specific indicator?“ 

The results of the mapping is a list of suggested indicators listed in the table below:

WordPress Data Table Plugin
Skip to content